A recent decision of the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) is reported in Community Care.
To cut a long story short a child
protection social work team manager was said to have been operating with a vacancy
rate of nearly 50% (3.5/7.5). In addition to her management duties, she is said to have had 40
unallocated cases assigned to her and was working long hours including evenings
and weekends. Not surprisingly, she was overwhelmed by her workload.
The case against the manager appears to be
that she tried to cope with the situation and did not complain with sufficient
vigour to her superiors about her problems. As a result, so it is argued, some children
received an unsafe service. The panel found that the manager chose to ask for
more resources for her team rather than highlighting any specific cases that
were of particular concern. After a full hearing the manager was given a three-year
caution by the HCPC. That will allow her to continue to practice, but will be a
stain on her record. She is now working in a non-management role.
It is hard to read this account and not be
left breathless by what appears to be the sheer chutzpah of those who brought the case. It has all the hallmarks of
a blame-the-victim culture, in which people are left unsupported to struggle in
impossible situations for which they are then held accountable.
How long will it take before the powers-that-be
realise that blaming people is a very poor way to achieve greater safety or high
quality? I challenge anybody to explain how bringing this case has helped
anyone. Safer services are brought about by people feeling able to talk openly
about the difficulties they have in coping with challenging situations. They
are brought about by supervisors who are quick to spot situations in which
people need help and support. They are brought about by valuing hard working
employees, not scapegoating them.
They are not brought about by unjustifiable and punitive disciplinary procedures, which are in danger of making professional regulation a laughing stock. The HCPC should concern itself with cases of egregious behaviour and never exercise sanctions against people who are just doing their best in difficult circumstances.
They are not brought about by unjustifiable and punitive disciplinary procedures, which are in danger of making professional regulation a laughing stock. The HCPC should concern itself with cases of egregious behaviour and never exercise sanctions against people who are just doing their best in difficult circumstances.